PR + Social media – Do your doctors treat a soc-med sneeze in time?!

If your brand catches a cold in the social media world, leave it unattended and chances are it turns out to a life-threatening disease.

Yes, a sneeze or cold could be common in real-life, but for your brand or organization – a cold is the best time the doctors in your organization attended to your brand buzz. Only thing, the doctors here are your very own social media managers – right up to your CEO!

It’s no more sheer paranoia to keep chanting about an impending social media crises, for the organization. To be ready to handle any social media crisis that will dent the reputation is now widely discussed and advised all over.

Do you have the right social-media doctors in place?

Do you have the right social-media doctors in place?

Just look around your Google or Bing search bar for social media disasters – and there are a few, in which the brand almost got killed, at least ephemerally. You had one guy resorting to a purchased/promoted tweet to express his frustration at a large global airline. As mentioned in the opening lines, the airline chose to delay attending to a social media sneeze, and its brand caught a severe flu.

It is not being prepared to handle such an event or online burst that is wanting – rather, it’s the vision or wherewithal to see a cropping up social media crisis for the organization and the ability to act post that, which is an impediment to effective crisis management.

So, what are some of the signs of such a social sneeze like? How do you know that a social media reputation hit, brewing in out there?!

  • Is there any unusual buzz around your brand (product, service, or people within your team) in the online space? Do you see some strange mentions about any of these, which have not been noticed earlier? This is something which is a pointer that you must take cognizance of the social media buzz, and probe to what may have triggered this. Yes, there is a possibility that this could be positive buzz. But, the cardinal rule in social media reputation management is this – unusual buzz tends to be more inclined on the negative side. A service issue or a misdemeanor by someone in your global team is more likely to generate a discussion or post, that something good.
  • Has there been an event that has occurred somewhere, where you foresee a lot of buzz? Could be a part failure or lack of retail-end availability of your offering. Or just anything like that. Its imperative that you watch out the social media buzz in that region with alacrity. When you know that there could a negative buzz coming in, its easy to deploy the necessary people and tools, and take up and address queries, and have a social-response hierarchy in place – effectively dousing the negative buzz, before it flames your reputation.
  • Has someone in your senior team, be it even your CEO or someone in the top echelons of the organization erred in the manner in which some issue has been communicated to the media, or even in an one of one interview, which has been quoted out of context, and is beginning to set a negative reputation spiral? Good reputation managers, backed by their real-time experience can see the coming in such situations. In such cases, it’s easy to be prepared with an effective response, and even post it to all media, and in all social destinations, and then also handle individual queries on a case by case basis, as the situation or kind of media demands.

These are just three illustrations that give the reputation manager or social media commander a feel of what could be coming in, and how it must be handled effectively to ward off an evil strike at the reputation base of the organization.

Logically, these can be extended to more permutations and combinations across geographies and various social destinations to serve as reputation hit forecasts.

Hope this helps you get that social media sneeze attended to swiftly. But, are your doctors in place?

Advertisements

Public Relations – Why are Indian marketers weary of news-jacking?!

News-jacking, as an all powerful tool in the PR armor is catching up like wild fire across the world.

Yet, how much have you heard of news-jacking being put to use in India? Not much, despite the fact that its our own iconic AMUL brand, being the pioneers of news jacking!

Amul’s witty and thoughtful, and almost daily topicals are best practical examples of news-jacking. When they did it firs in the yesteryear, little would the brand custodians have imagined that what was done in a simple easy to reach way will become “news-jacking”, and pioneered by David Meerman Scott.

Amul - our own news-jackers!

More recently, Groupon India resorted to news-jacking, by making use of the spiraling onion prices in the country – and the marketing and public relations mileage they obtained was phenomenal. If you judge the spin-off in AVE terms, they would have garnered immense value for the paltry PR money that went into the effort.

It was a crash that Groupon would have loved for the attention, and the marketing mileage!

It was a crash that Groupon would have loved for the attention, and the marketing mileage!

Yet, you don’t see it being much used as a tool in India.

Why? Is it that we are too touchy about how sensibilities might get hurt in this sub-continent, or is it just Indian marketers and brands are comfortable with conventional tools?

Just google, and you shall find how every possible event from the US presidential election, to Hurricane Sandy,  and more recently, the Royal baby have been news-jacked – ensuring unimaginable marketing mileage – which would cost very high in other means!

What do you think as  a public relations maven?? Is it time for more and more news-jacking in our public relations arsenals?

 

Public Relations – Is it fair to name/shame clients + media?

In the past few days I have seen some posts in the social media, wherein public relations/communication professionals have given vent to their feelings on issues of impact with respect to the media and some of their clients as well.

Interestingly, I did also see a group in Facebook, formed by public relations professionals. The intent of this group, is to enlighten the PR fraternity of clients and some friends in the media who make some unreasonable demand or don’t keep up their commitments.

The advent of social is making such things a lot easier, propelling us to ‘do’ before we ‘think’….

Media and Client blacklist - Fairplay?

No one denies any of us the right to express our feelings, particularly when a lot of hard work and professional contribution is at stake.

But, is not naming/shaming specific clients or friends in the media (may be a handful of them in the vast media universe, where), taking expression of freedom too far?

Think of this situation – as PR counsels, we continue to promise a whole lot of media deliverables to our client – both existing and prospective.

Some of it is accomplished by us, while a lot is yet missed – but there is no doubt in the kind of efforts we put in, in making sure we communicate our client position to the media at large.

Fact is, even the media works on a whole lot of extraneous factors, and the fierce competition for what is relevant to the consumer! So, even assuming that our media friends did file a story with our inputs, the editor may find it redundant to take.

What if some of our clients gang up together and decide to take on our reputation, for no mistake of any of us? That would be grossly unfair we would think, and defend our duties to the hilt.

By the same logic, should’nt we leave this naming business just to word of mouth, which is by far the best tool in marketing.

Think of this – did you feel good when one in the PR fraternity was shamed big time by a rare public post by “Cleartrip”?

You thought what cleartrip did was right? You'll take that??

Forget the details, the fact is none of us would want to be bashed in public, while as a community, we work on a handful of external factors.

The same ought to apply to the media and client as well.

Except offcourse when it comes to issues of ethics and corruption – even which are  best handled by word of mouth.

So, would you yet think to name and shame if fair? Not sure….?!