Public Relations & News-jacking : When must you news-jack?

News jacking, pioneered by the good David Meerman Scott ( @dmscott ), as an armor in your public relations strategy is here to stay. And not just stay – the only way you will be able to make a significant value addition to your brand is to use news-jacking, more in the coming times.

That can only happen, if as a marketing or PR pro, you are real-time ‘new-jacking’ ready!

There is also a raging debate on the merits and de-merits of news-jacking.

When should we in PR or marketing news-jack??

When should we in PR or marketing news-jack??

The answer to that debate is this – you must news-jack at the right time, in the right place, in the right context. There are no two ways about it.

While there can be a long debate on the when and how of new jacking as a PR tool, brands must look at news jacking if it has the following impact for them-

  • Will it show the brand, products and services in good light, in the context of the event?
  • Does the consumer see the brand has something beneficial to offer – either by way of information or services, or tangible/intangible product benefit?
  • Will news jacking in the given situation serve brand-lift in the short and long term?
  • Will news jacking stand the test of ethics in business and also stand any legal test, that may come to the fore by any stakeholders?
  • Would all the stakeholders in the product/service be happy with the technique used to news.

As a PR professional, and an avid news-jacker, ask yourself these quick questions when you embark in your next news jacking sojourn!

 

Advertisements

Public Relations – Is it fair to name/shame clients + media?

In the past few days I have seen some posts in the social media, wherein public relations/communication professionals have given vent to their feelings on issues of impact with respect to the media and some of their clients as well.

Interestingly, I did also see a group in Facebook, formed by public relations professionals. The intent of this group, is to enlighten the PR fraternity of clients and some friends in the media who make some unreasonable demand or don’t keep up their commitments.

The advent of social is making such things a lot easier, propelling us to ‘do’ before we ‘think’….

Media and Client blacklist - Fairplay?

No one denies any of us the right to express our feelings, particularly when a lot of hard work and professional contribution is at stake.

But, is not naming/shaming specific clients or friends in the media (may be a handful of them in the vast media universe, where), taking expression of freedom too far?

Think of this situation – as PR counsels, we continue to promise a whole lot of media deliverables to our client – both existing and prospective.

Some of it is accomplished by us, while a lot is yet missed – but there is no doubt in the kind of efforts we put in, in making sure we communicate our client position to the media at large.

Fact is, even the media works on a whole lot of extraneous factors, and the fierce competition for what is relevant to the consumer! So, even assuming that our media friends did file a story with our inputs, the editor may find it redundant to take.

What if some of our clients gang up together and decide to take on our reputation, for no mistake of any of us? That would be grossly unfair we would think, and defend our duties to the hilt.

By the same logic, should’nt we leave this naming business just to word of mouth, which is by far the best tool in marketing.

Think of this – did you feel good when one in the PR fraternity was shamed big time by a rare public post by “Cleartrip”?

You thought what cleartrip did was right? You'll take that??

Forget the details, the fact is none of us would want to be bashed in public, while as a community, we work on a handful of external factors.

The same ought to apply to the media and client as well.

Except offcourse when it comes to issues of ethics and corruption – even which are  best handled by word of mouth.

So, would you yet think to name and shame if fair? Not sure….?!

Public relations – One promise that must make you think…!

What’s one public relations promise that should make you wary of the agency that comes in to make a pitch for your account?

The answer is simple, and straight forward.

And most of us on the other side – the client side – of the table know this answer well.

Its the promise of column inches in print and air-time in news channels and GE channels!

With the advent of competition and a handful of also-ran self styled PR guru’s and their clan, column inch and air-time promises are offered on a platter, and even put in the RFP’s by the clients inviting pitch.

Gujarat government may be a good brand for PR measure, but you?

Gujarat government may be a good brand for PR measure, but you?

And when one brand gets the promise of PR measurement in its terms of engagement, there’s an irresistible itch with a host of others who seek public relations counsel.

Columns centimetre driven PR is passe – and whomever does it in the pitch is in a wild goose chase…  the probability is high that the team that comes in to make the pitch, with promises galore may not even be seen after the win. The team that shall deliver the work on the ground will be different and just try pleasing you with a promise of the future.

Not just that – what is the context, where do you want you to be seen in the news? in print and visual – is it relevant to your target audience, the product you wish to sell, and in your segment…  there are so many questions in the PR outcome vis a vis your need.

Every brand cannot be like a Infosys or Namo – where even loads of column inches even in the negative, will make sense. Would it be so for your company and brand?

Then why would you fall for the PR pitch that promises the PR measure moon?

Look at the specifics, the context, the placement and the timing. Those are the relevant factors.

See PR measure in that framework. That will make eminent sense, that trying to paint image stripes on your ‘cat brand’ trying to emulate the tiger.