Public Relations – Is it fair to name/shame clients + media?

In the past few days I have seen some posts in the social media, wherein public relations/communication professionals have given vent to their feelings on issues of impact with respect to the media and some of their clients as well.

Interestingly, I did also see a group in Facebook, formed by public relations professionals. The intent of this group, is to enlighten the PR fraternity of clients and some friends in the media who make some unreasonable demand or don’t keep up their commitments.

The advent of social is making such things a lot easier, propelling us to ‘do’ before we ‘think’….

Media and Client blacklist - Fairplay?

No one denies any of us the right to express our feelings, particularly when a lot of hard work and professional contribution is at stake.

But, is not naming/shaming specific clients or friends in the media (may be a handful of them in the vast media universe, where), taking expression of freedom too far?

Think of this situation – as PR counsels, we continue to promise a whole lot of media deliverables to our client – both existing and prospective.

Some of it is accomplished by us, while a lot is yet missed – but there is no doubt in the kind of efforts we put in, in making sure we communicate our client position to the media at large.

Fact is, even the media works on a whole lot of extraneous factors, and the fierce competition for what is relevant to the consumer! So, even assuming that our media friends did file a story with our inputs, the editor may find it redundant to take.

What if some of our clients gang up together and decide to take on our reputation, for no mistake of any of us? That would be grossly unfair we would think, and defend our duties to the hilt.

By the same logic, should’nt we leave this naming business just to word of mouth, which is by far the best tool in marketing.

Think of this – did you feel good when one in the PR fraternity was shamed big time by a rare public post by “Cleartrip”?

You thought what cleartrip did was right? You'll take that??

Forget the details, the fact is none of us would want to be bashed in public, while as a community, we work on a handful of external factors.

The same ought to apply to the media and client as well.

Except offcourse when it comes to issues of ethics and corruption – even which are ┬ábest handled by word of mouth.

So, would you yet think to name and shame if fair? Not sure….?!

Advertisements

PR & Reputation – the “infy” lesson!

Infosys is (or should we say was) a benchmark when it comes to great practices as to how a company ought to be run based on merit.

That was a thing of the past, you may say, but the image of the company was built on that foundation.

Every news that came out of the IT bellwether (do you yet call it one?) was almost testimony to what a great company Infosys was and what impregnable values the founders and promoters stood for.

The cardinal rule in public relations and managing your reputation is – you just cannot build an image out of a hollow core – the core of what your product, service and people stand for!

At least a few of us, if not all, think – with our expertise in the practice of PR and story telling, we can create an image for a client – a positive image, irrespective of what the ground realities be. That’s a fallacy, and will be grossly misleading.

Reality is bound to catch up – and when it does it can hit hard, and create a solid dent in the image – a dent deep enough to maul the hard built image.

Not just should the core be in place – it must remain for the life of the organisation, undiluted.

If not, then the risk of being like Infosys would haunt you.

Whither corporate governance.. What Infy teaches us in PR.

Whither corporate governance.. What Infy teaches us in PR.

The earlier image of Infosys was solid and impeccable, only until the very people who promoted and stood by the values went on to dilute the same for the sake of expediency.

Who would have thought that you would see a day, when the experts in corporate governance, and those at the stock markets would ask Infosys, on why there was a semblance of nepotism, and erred corporate practices in the way the company is run?

Even a great image lasts only until your core is in tact – and the PR or reputation is garner is directly related to how great the core is, and is perceived as well.

Dilute the core values, and through the eyes of Infy, you could see what the world speaks of your brand.

So, whats driving your image? Sheer hollow PR, or is that PR as an outcome of what core values your brand stands for??